Legal Opinion

Engineers Construction Corp. v. Tolbert

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 4, 1924No. 10,643PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

The court below overruled a demurrer to the further and separate answer of defendant Tolbert to plaintiff’s bill of interpleader, the plaintiff stood by the demurrer, and, upon judgment against him, brings error. There is no brief nor appearance for any defendant in error.

The plaintiff was engaged in constructing a road under contract with the state highway department. It let a subcontract to defendant in error Lafferty to furnish sand and gravel. Lafferty completed his contract and plaintiff paid him all but $513. Tolbert had done part of Lafferty’s work and sued plaintiff before defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Newhall v. KastensIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Smith v. MosierU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1909
  3. Wilmer v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MCI Constructors, Inc. v. District Court of Pueblo CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Mason v. Le Clair Mines Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  3. Kilgore v. GraceSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  4. MCI Constructors, Inc. v. District Court of Pueblo CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API