Lincoln Trust Co. v. McVickar
New York Supreme Court
Motion to compel service of a reply in an action of inter-pleader.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
This motion to compel the plaintiff to reply to the new matter contained in the answer is resisted chiefly upon the authority of Scofield v. Demorest, 7 N. Y. Supp. 832, but the motion in that case was denied because there the justification pleaded covered the entire history of a judicial controversy, and contained, as the court pointed out, a lengthy and detailed statement, partly of facts and partly of evidence of facts, and it was held that it would be oppressive to put upon the plaintiff the burden of going minutely over such elaborate recital and of admitting, denying, ignoring or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Scofield v. DemorestNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Cavanagh v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.New York Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by2 opinions
- Livingston v. A. B. Dick Co.New York Supreme Court · 1932
- Writting v. New York & Long Island Traction Co., New York County Courts1915