Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arthur G. McKee & Company v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 10, 1975No. 1 Ca-IC 1209Published

1DissentWren, Judge

I do not agree. The majority’s opinion is predicated on finding that genuine fear on the part of the claimant justifies a refusal to undergo surgery.

In my opinion, this conclusion can find no support in either the statutes or case law. The test as to reasonable refusal is. an objective rather than a subjective one. A.R.S. § 23-1026(E) states in pertinent part:

“[T]he commission may reduce or suspend the compensation of an employee . who refuses to submit to medical or surgical treatment reasonably necessary to promote his recovery.” (Emphasis supplied).

Also, A.R.S. § 23-1027 provides:

“No…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hays v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API