Legal Opinion

In re Superintendent of the Poor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by Samuel Beck, 'superintendent of the poor of Westchester county, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Westchester Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of' the county of Westchester on the 2d day of May, 1896, denying his motion to vacate a warrant of attachment theretofore granted against him.

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, P. J.:

It appears from the record before us that, on March seventh last, a subpoena, signed by Charles L. Lane, chairman of the committee of superintendent of the poor of Westchester county, was duly served upon Samuel Beck, in the city of New York, commanding him to appear at the office of the board of supervisors, in Westchester county, on March 11, 1896, at ten a. m., to testify and be *145examined in relation to matters therein stated. Said Beck neglected and refused to attend in response to said subpoena, and on April 4, 1896, Justice Keogh, of the Supreme Court, upon proof of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Steitz v. RiceNew York Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Hastings v. HofstadterNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. In re the Examination of Union BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. In re the Examination of Union BankNew York Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Matter of BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API