Legal Opinion

Planters' Bank of Tunica v. New York Life Ins.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 25, 1926No. 4512PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

On October 4, 1921, the New York Life Insurance Company, defendant in error, issued its policy on the life of Simon Caplan for $25,000. The policy provided for payment of double indemnity in the event that “the death of the insured resulted directly and independently of all other causes from bodily injury effected solely through external, violent, and accidental cause.” The policy also provided that *603“this double indemnity benefit will not apply if the insured’s death resulted from self-destruction, whether sane or insane.” The policy further provided: “In the event of…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. New York Life Ins. Co. v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
  2. ætna Life Ins. Co. v. TooleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1926
  3. New York Life Ins. v. TrimbleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  4. Love v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  5. Travelers' Ins. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API