Montgomery County v. Bradford
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Dissent
ELDRIDGE,
dissenting.
I disagree with the majority’s opinion and decision in two major respects.
First, the majority clearly errs in refusing to consider the consent decree entered in the underlying cases on November 26, 1996, and in taking the position that the decree is not before us. The majority opinion overlooks entirely the respondents’ motion to dismiss Montgomery County’s appeal on the ground that the consent decree has rendered the appeal moot. In order for a decree to render moot an earlier appeal from a denial of intervention, however, the decree must be within the trial court’s…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rendell-Baker v. KohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. TarkanianSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.