Legal Opinion

Tidwell v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 9, 2009No. S08A1783PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melton, Justice.

Following a jury trial, Jerry Tidwell was found guilty of possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, possession of marijuana, and possession of drug-related objects. On appeal, Tid-well contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress, and in finding that OCGA § 16-13-32.2 (possession of drug-related objects) is constitutional. Because we find that the trial court erred in denying Tidwell’s motion to suppress, we reverse.

The record reveals that on February 13, 2007, investigators from the Forsyth County Sheriffs Office were attempting to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  5. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ColvardSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  2. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  3. State v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. Nuckles v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  5. State v. HogansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API