Chisolm v. State

SOUTHWICK, P.J.,

for the Court.

¶ 1. David Chisolm was convicted after a jury trial of timber theft. On appeal, he alleges error by the lower court in admitting certain evidence, in allowing impeachment of a prosecution witness, and in failing to grant a circumstantial evidence jury *683instruction. Chisolm further challenges the weight and sufficiency of the evidence. We find no error and affirm.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

¶ 2. Evidence in the record supports the following account of events. In April 2000, David Chisolm and his nephew approached landowner Jimmy Zeigler seeking a right-of-way to cut timber…