Legal Opinion

Frankfort Bank v. Countryman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1860PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL PROM COuNTV COURT, GREEN LAKE COUNTY. This was an action upon a promissory note by Wm. J. Frank, and indorsed by the defendant to the plaintiff. The facts will be sufficiently gathered from the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Cole, J.

We think that this judgment should be affirmed. An examination of the complaint will show that the first and second grounds of the demurrer are not true in point of fact. The complaint does allege that the appellant indorsed the note for value to the bank. The third objection taken to the complaint is, that it no where appears therein, that the payment of the note was demanded at the place where the same was made payable, namely, the Frankfort Bank, &c. It is true the complaint states that the note was made payable at that bank; and it alleges that payment of the note was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Prindle v. . CaruthersNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Gay v. Paine & PaineNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Platt v. RobinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miles v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. South Milwaukee Co. v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Shull v. BartonNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Andresen v. Upham Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Cutler v. AinsworthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API