H. Herpolsheimer Co. v. Lincoln Traction Co.

The opinion in this case is reported in 96 Neb. 154. A motion for rehearing and a brief in support thereof has been filed. These are evidently based upon a misapprehension of the meaning and scope of the opinion. Defendant concedes and asserts, as in its original brief, that “the jurisdiction to affect the service, whether it should be on Twelfth street or Fourteenth street, resided entirely with the commission. * * * This part of the decision is manifestly right.”

*114The contention is that the defendant company had the power and right to change the routing of its cars on its own initiative, and…