Legal Opinion
In re Baldwinsville Telephone Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Application for a writ of peremptory mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtHiscock, J.
This is an application for a writ of peremptory mandamus compelling the Central Few York Telephone & Telegraph Company to place in the office of the petitioner.“ one of its telephone instruments with the usual proper wires and connections and to allow said Baldwinsville Telephone Company the proper, usual and customary use of said telepMliei“linstrument, wires and connections.” r
The petitioner is a corporatio*4®perating a telephone system in the village of Baldwinsville. The defendant is likewise a corporation operating a similar system in said villagg and also> extensively outside* thereof. •.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People ex rel. McGrath v. Green Island Water Co.New York Supreme Court · 1890
- People ex rel. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Hudson River Tel. Co.New York Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by3 opinions
- People ex rel. Oneida Telephone Co. v. Central New York Telephone & Telegraph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Rose v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914
- Rose v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914