Legal Opinion

City of Galveston v. Hemmis

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1889No. 2480PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Galveston. Tried below before Hon. Wm. H. Stewart.

1Opinion of the Court

Collard, Judge.

Appellant’s first assignment of error is that the verdict of the jury is contrary to the following instruction of the court given at request of defendant: “If you believe from the evidence that the plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant and had the same or equal means of knowing the condition of the sidewalk where he was injured as did the defendant, and that the defect was patent, open, and visible, then you will find for the defendant.”

By this charge two questions of fact were presented to the jury, the finding of both of which in the affirmative was necessary to a…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PrestonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Kimmell v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Barth v. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  4. City of Denison v. SanfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  5. Garrett v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API