Legal Opinion

Geer v. Hall

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 12, 1958No. 18144PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

Defendant in error, to whom we will refer as Hall, made application for the issuance of a “three-way” liquor license. Following a hearing before the Manager of Safety and Excise of the City and County of Denver, the application was denied.

Pursuant to provisions of Rule 106, R.C.P. Colo., Hall instituted proceedings in the district court of Denver in the nature of certiorari. Counsel for plaintiff in error filed a motion in the district court to disqualify the trial judge to whom the cause was assigned. The motion to disqualify was in the following form:

“COMES NOW the respondent, Edward O.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Geer v. StathopulosSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. MacArthur v. PrestoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. SalardinoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kovacheff v. LanghartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API