Legal Opinion

Rozar v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 11, 1956No. 35957PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

1. The word “woman” in Code § 26-5901 defining sodomy as “the carnal knowledge and connection against the order of nature, by man with man, or in the same unnatural manner with woman” must in the absence of statutory amplification be treated in its generic meaning as signifying “the female part of the human race; womankind.” Webster’s New International Dictionary, 2nd ed., unabridged (2). An examination of the record in Hodges v. State, 94 Ga. 593 (19 S. E. 758) shows that the word “man” was so treated, the catamite there being a child 3 years of age. That case was reversed on the general…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lane Drug Stores Inc. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  2. Cooper v. ChambleeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Wharton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Proctor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Clayton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Cameron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  5. Cameron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API