Legal Opinion

Kyle v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 17, 1913PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is an action of tort to recover for the death of the plaintiff’s child, a boy five years and eleven months old, who was run over and killed on Huntington Avenue in Boston at about 7.25 o’clock in the evening of May 4,1906, by a car operated by the defendant. At the close of the evidence a verdict was ordered* for the defendant on the ground that the plaintiff’s intestate was not in the exercise of due care. The case is here on the plaintiff’s exceptions.

We do not find it necessary to consider whether there was evidence of gross negligence on the part of the motorman since we are of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McDermott v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  2. Stackpole v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Morey v. Gloucester Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Murphy v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. Young v. SmallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. ChadwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Boni v. GoldsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Tripp v. TaftMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Olson v. PayneWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Swetzoff v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API