Legal Opinion

Nash v. Truesdel

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 18, 1942No. 29740PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) 1. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a nonsuit and in refusing to dismiss the petition as amended. A motion for a non-suit is not erroneously denied and a new trial will not be granted where the entire evidence authorizes a verdict for the plaintiff. W. & A. Railroad Co. v. Landers, 142 Ga. 774 (83 S. E. 788); Duncan v. Redd, 14 Ga. App. 306 (80 S. E. 726). It did not appear from the petition as amended that there had been a mutual rescission of the contract and that therefore there was no obligation on the part of the defendant to erect a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Duncan v. ReddCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  2. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. LandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ayers Enterprises, Ltd. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API