Legal Opinion
Repossession Spec. v. Geico Ins.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 12, 2012No. A-2712-10T1PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
33 A.3d 1242 (2012)
423 N.J. Super. 518
REPOSSESSION SPECIALISTS, Theodore Van Santen and AmeriCredit, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent.
Annetta Jackson, Plaintiff,
v.
Repossession Specialists Inc., Theodore Van Santen and AmeriCredit, Defendants.
Docket No. A-2712-10T1
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted November 30, 2011.
Decided January 12, 2012.
Garrity, Graham, Murphy, Garofalo & Flinn, attorneys for appellants (Frank H. Reimers and Rudolph G. Morabito, East Hanover, on the briefs).
Green, Lundgren & Ryan, P.C., attorneys for respondent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sparks v. St. Paul InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Matits v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Bowler v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Fastenberg v. Prudential InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Proformance Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Robinson v. ZornNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013