Thrasher v. Burlage
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Per curiam
We do not reach the errors assigned by appellant, Daniel L. Thrasher, Jr., Executor of the Estate of Emma P. Thrasher, Deceased, because we have concluded that the writ must be dismissed for non-compliance with the Rules of Court.
In his motion to dismiss, appellee D. H. Burlage invokes Rules 5:35, 5:36, 5:37 and 5:48. The provisions of these Rules, applicable whenever an appeal is not to be heard on the original record, Rule 5:41, are plain and uncomplicated. Within 10 days after the date of a certificate awarding an appeal, the appellant must, in the absence of an agreement “as to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Vaughan v. Johnson and MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
3Cited by19 opinions
- Patterson v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
- Rhoten v. United Virginia BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
- Curtis Lee Mason v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
- Abderrahim Naaman v. Sahar LarrazabalCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Bernard L. DiNicola v. Target CorporationCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.