State Ex Rel. Phipps v. Royal Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClakksoN, J.
The main question involved in this appeal: In an action against the surety on a guardian’s bond, when the guardian has defaulted and his whereabouts unknown, and the defendant is the sole surety, and claims that the guardian, who was assistant clerk of the Superior Court, had given to the clerk of the Superior Court a bond in another bonding company for his faithful performance of his duties as assistant clerk of the Superior Court, is the clerk of the Superior Court or the bonding company on the assistant clerk of the Superior Court bond necessary or proper parties to said action? We think…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bruce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- State Ex Rel . Barnes v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- State Ex Rel. Harris v. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Phipps v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932