Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Curran

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1854PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Tlie principles enunciated in tlie three foregoing cases are identical, and the facts are apparent from the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court

Welch, C. J.

The Plaintiff brought an ac-in the District Court for the County of Bamsey, on a bill of exchange drawn by Charles P. Freeman & Co. on the Defendants, and payable to the order of Charles P. Freeman & Co. at the office of Carter & Co. Chicago.

The complaint is in the usual form. It avers, among other things, that the Plaintiff and Charles P. Freeman, since deceased, being partners in business, made their certain bill of exchange, by the name of Charles F. Freeman & Co.: that the bill was duly accepted by tlie Defendants, and afterwards was duly presented at the office of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vermilye v. VermilyeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API