Legal Opinion
Muckenfuss v. Atlanta & C. A. L. Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 5, 1922No. 10914PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Cothran.
Action for damages on account of the destruction by fire of a broom factory building and contents, alleged to have been caused by sparks from the engine of the railroad company. The plaintiffs are the owners of the property and certain insurance companies claiming to be subrogated to the extent of the policies paid by them. The case was tried before Judge Sease and a jury, and a verdict rendered in favor of the defendants. The plaintiffs have appealed.
It appears that at some time prior to February 8, 1906, Muckenfuss Manufacturing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stewart v. OuthwaiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Walker v. Chester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
- Denton v. C., R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- O'Farrell v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Fitzpatrick v. WeberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Braudie v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950