Legal Opinion

People v. Compton

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 1, 1990No. 4-89-0408PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Spitz

Defendant Compton (defendant) and Kim Parse were charged by information with forgery and both pleaded guilty. Parse is not involved in this appeal. The trial court sentenced defendant to five years’ imprisonment and later denied his motion to reconsider the sentence and for leave to withdraw his guilty plea. Defendant appeals.

On November 29, 1988, defendant and Kim Parse were charged with forgery after they took a check belonging to Amy McLain, forged her endorsement, and cashed the check. Defendant and Parse originally pleaded not guilty to the charge, but later withdrew their pleas and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. PerruquetIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Wilson v. HarelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. People v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. BourkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. People v. DonnellyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. People v. HausmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. People v. PetersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. People v. WillisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API