Legal Opinion

McLean v. Yost

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 29, 1995No. 4—94—0865PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lund

This is a case in which defense counsel, in a personal injury action, made a supposed tender under the provisions of section 5 — 126 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 110, par. 5 — 126) (now 735 ILCS 5/5 — 126 (West 1992)) to settle for an amount of $18,000. No money was deposited with the court. Plaintiff refused, went to trial, and the jury delivered a verdict in defendant’s favor. Now defense counsel’s "tender” became a major problem because by motion for judgment n.o.v., plaintiff renewed her contention (made previously in a motion for summary judgment and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. GableAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
  2. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. BealsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  3. Goebel v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Joiner v. SVM Management, LLCIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Joiner v. SVM Management, LLCIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Able Masonry Development Co.,v. Hastings Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
  4. Country Mutual Insurance Company v. Styck's Body Shop, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. Country Mutual Insurance v. Styck's Body Shop, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API