Legal Opinion
Supreme Council A. L. H. v. McAlarney
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 13, 1905No. 45PublishedCited by 3 opinions
■ In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District- of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
ACHESON, Circuit Judge.
The judgment brought before us by this writ of error for review was rendered against the defendant (the plaintiff in error) for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
Of course, for present purposes, we must accept as true all the distinct averments and specific statements of fact contained in that affidavit. The plaintiff (McAlarney) was the holder of an insurance certificate for $5,000, issued to him by the defendant association, similar *73to the certificates which were involved in the cases of Supreme Council, etc., v. Black, 123 Fed. 650, 59 C. C. A. 414, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Supreme Council A. L. H. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- Morgan v. McKeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
- Supreme Council A. L. H. v. LippincottCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
- Supreme Council A. L. H. v. DaixCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davies v. Sun Life Assur. Co. of CanadaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1932
- Ankele v. Workingmen's Relief Societies, A. U. V. O.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1913
- Guthrie v. Supreme Tent Knights of MacCabeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906