Legal Opinion

State v. Stokes

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2017No. 27838PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZinter, Justice

[¶1.] Nathan Stokes appeals from convictions of simple assault and intentional damage to property. He argues that the trial court erred in admitting purported business records (a text-message log). We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Facts and Procedural History

[¶2.] Nathan Stokes is the ex-boyfriend of Lyndsey Braunesreither. The two met on Facebook and became involved in an on-and-off relationship for roughly four years. Stokes lived with Braunesreither in Sioux Falls from January 2014 to August or September 2014. They then dated casually until June or July 2015. They broke up at the end…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. AdefehintiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  3. Zafer Taahhut Insaat Ve Ticaret A.S. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. State v. BergetSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Dickerson & ReecySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State v. ReevesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. TurnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Braun v. WollmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API