Legal Opinion

Molly M. v. Edwin F.

New York Family Court

Decided April 8, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Judith Sheindlin, J.

This paternity proceeding, under article 5 of the Family Court Act, was instituted in 1980. To date there has not been a hearing on the merits of this case.

In a decision dated October 14, 1982, the Honorable Gertrud Mainzer directed that the parties submit to a human leucocyte antigen (HLA) test pursuant to section 532 of the Family Court Act and scheduled a court appearance for the purpose of fixing the date, time and place of the test.

Parties and attorneys were duty notified and on February 8,1983 the petitioner, her attorney and the respondent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Noce v. KaufmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Chase Manhattan Bank (National Ass'n) v. HobbsCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. TamolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Ettore I. v. Angela D.New York City Family Court · 1985
  3. Joseph P. M. ex rel. Karen S. v. Boyce R.New York City Family Court · 1985
  4. Eagan v. AydCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Eagan v. AydCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API