Legal Opinion
National Surety Corp. v. Heinbokel
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 4, 1946No. 8751PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
This is a diversity case in which the plaintiff sued as subrogee of J. H. Brooks & Company, a New York brokerage house. The defendants are accountants and were requested by Brooks & Company to make an audit of its books in 1936 and again in 1939. It was alleged that under practically the same circumstances in both audits the defendants failed to discover and report the theft of certain securities by one Storay, an employee of Brooks & Company. The answer denied any fault on the part of the defendants.
At the trial, Storay testified that in 1936 and 1939 he had,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Throckmorton v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- St. Paul Plow Works v. StarlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Schoen v. ElsasserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- State Line & Sullivan R. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Stetson v. CroskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gafford v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
- Lillian Weiss v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Bowman v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Martin v. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Virginia Benedict and Leonard Benedict v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.