Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Smith

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action to foreclose mortgage. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, besides the owner of the equity, the indorsers of the note secured by the mortgage, and a claimant to a mechanic’s lien, are made parties defendant. Smith, asserting the hen, alone answers. Durland, the mortgagor, is maker of the note. The American Deposit & Loan Company, indorser, is under no liability to plaintiff, its indorsement being merely to pass title to the note. Libby, the other indorser, is guarantor of the note. The note was for a loan of $50,000, which, in addition to the mortgage, was secured by a pledge of stock. Foreclosure is sought not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hayes v. WardNew York Court of Chancery · 1819
  2. People v. E. Remington & SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Castle v. . NoyesNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  4. Cheesebrough v. MillardNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
  5. Evertson v. BoothNew York Supreme Court · 1822

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. General Phoenix Corp. v. CabotNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. In re the Estate of DellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  3. In Re Elmwood Farms, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API