Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Talavera

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 25, 1976No. CM 431162Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partO’Donnell, Judge

I concur with the majority on the issues of speedy trial and pretrial identification. However, I do not agree that the appellant’s pretrial statements were voluntary. I agree generally with the facts set forth by the majority concerning the statements. However, in order to place the legal question in the proper perspective it is appropriate to set forth additional facts bearing on this issue.

As correctly noted by the majority, the testimony concerning the confessions is in conflict in several significant areas. The appellant testified that he was arrested at 0500 hours on 2 February 1973 by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Brown v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Chambers v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API