Charlotte's Fancy Restaurant, Inc. v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed.
*867The majority at the Appellate Division properly construed the provision at issue, section B32-297.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York. In this context, the court’s review is limited to whether there was substantial evidence in the record to support the Department of Consumer Affairs’ determination that petitioner operated an unlicensed cabaret (300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176), and we conclude that there was.
Accordingly, we reverse the judgment, without…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dawson v. Village of Spring ValleyNew York Supreme Court · 1991
- Matter of Belile v. St. Lawrence County Sheriff's Department, Corrections DivisionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. CaroLine's For Comedy, Inc.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1988
- Sky Medical Supply Inc. v. Elrac Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2014