Florida Bar v. Rassner
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
Arguments were heard in this case oh January 8, 1964. The record and judgment of the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar have been examined by this Court. We find, as did the Board of Governors, that the respondent is guilty of violating Rule 11.02(4) of the Integration Rule, and Canon 11, 31 F.S.A.
We have decided, however, that the suspension from the practice of law for a period of three years, recommended by the Board of Governors, is too severe under all the facts and circumstances. Consequently we substitute our judgment in place of the order of suspension of the Board of Governors. It…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Florida Bar v. RassnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- In re RassnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- In re Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- In re RassnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1972