Legal Opinion

State v. Fiasconaro

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 3, 1991No. 8825PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

The state appealed, with the trial court’s permission, from the dismissal of its amended information charging the defendant with the crime of acting as a professional bondsman without a license in violation of General Statutes § 29-145.1 The state contends that the court mistakenly required an allegation of receiving a tangible benefit in return for posting bail. The state also claims that the trial court improperly distinguished between a person who obtains the pretrial release of an individual by posting cash bail and one who posts a surety bond.

The following facts are relevant to a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sutton v. LopesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Lucarelli v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reliance Insurance v. ReiderConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  2. State v. AnonymousConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API