Legal Opinion

Bloomshield v. City of Bay City

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1916No. Docket No. 43PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Bay; Collins, J. Assumpsit by John H. Bloomshield against the city of Bay City for services rendered. Judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

(after stating the facts). 1. In construing statutes, courts, following a familiar rule, seek to find a meaning which is reasonable and which gives effect to all parts, all provisions, of the law. Here is a law plainly intended to turn over to a commission the care and control of the city parks, to exercise all powérs and perform all duties theretofore vested in the common council and its committee by the charter and ordinances of the city and the rules of the council. This is the general purpose of the law. In addition, certain powers are specifically mentioned as being conferred upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Berrien Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Van Wert v. School-District No. 8Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Willsie v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Petition of State Highway CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Chamski v. Wayne County Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API