Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Bell

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 19, 1997No. 79186Published

1ConcurrenceLimbaugh, Judge

The conviction of Winston Bell for the gruesome murder of his wife, for burning her alive, is overturned because of the Court’s strict adherence to the rule of evidence that excludes hearsay testimony. Justice has not been served. The hearsay evidence admitted at trial, although technically inadmissible even under the state-of-mind exception, was nevertheless probative and trustworthy. The federal courts and the courts of twenty-nine of our sister states have now relieved the harshness of the hearsay rule by implementing a residual or omnibus exception that may be invoked, in general, when no…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FIGGIE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Mark R. Cook v. Frederick B. HoppinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Higgs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API