Legal Opinion

Beck v. Gibson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 8, 1977No. 20450PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice:

This is an appeal from a jury verdict in favor of Beck for $15,000 actual damages. Beck had brought the action for damages arising from the injuries to his hogs by appellant’s German Shepherd dog. We find no reversible error and affirm.

The testimony showed that respondent was in the business of raising purebred Yorkshire hogs for breeding stock. These hogs were attacked, some being wounded and some killed, in the summer and fall of 1975. On one occasion in the fall respondent and his employee witnessed appellant’s dog in the act of attacking.

Appellant first argues that he was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas-McCain, Inc. v. SiterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  2. Goudelock v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  3. Marsh Plywood Corp. v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reid v. KellySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. Rosamond Enterprises, Inc. v. McGranahanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Southern Realty & Construction Co. v. BryanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. South Carolina National Bank v. JoynerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Cartee v. LesleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API