Legal Opinion
Lucas v. Parish of Jefferson
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided March 31, 1998No. Civil Action 97-1513PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
BERRIGAN, District Judge.
Defendant, Michael Reynolds (“Reynolds”), has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on the basis (1) that he is absolutely immune from suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and (2) that the petitioners, Glenn and Eva Lucas (“the Lucases”) have failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons that follow, the motion is DENIED.
Procedural History
According to the petition filed in this matter 1 , as well as other court documents (Ree. Does. 1 & 83), the Lucases pled guilty on January 10, 1995, to violating La.Rev.Stat. § 14:56, simple…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Douglas Echols v. Spencer LawtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Douglas Echols v. Spencer LawtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Ex parte B.T. Roberts, in his capacity as a member of the Auburn University Board of Trustees PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (In re: Patti H. Northcutt and Walter M. Northcutt v. B.T. Roberts, in his capacity as a member of the Auburn University Board of Trustees) (Lee Circuit Court: CV-22-900114).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2025
- Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2000
- Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.