Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eyerman v. Blakesley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 1883Published

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Boyle, J.

1Dissent

Dissenting opinion by

Bakewell, J.

I cannot see that the city engineer has any authority, express or implied, to let this work out in sections. I consider that I have nothing to do with the question whether he ought to have this power or not. I concurred in Eyerman v. Hardy (8 Mo. App. 311). That case was very carefully considered, and has been followed by this court in subsequent cases. I do not think that it ought to be disturbed.

I cod cur in what is said in the opinion of the court in this case as to the power of the president of the board of *415improvements to certify to the tax-bill. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eyerman v. HardyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API