Legal Opinion

Ingersoll v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 2004No. 03-124, 03-125PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

[¶ 1] This case involves appeals from the judgment and sentence convicting appellant Chandler A. Ingersoll of one count of felony possession of methamphetamine and one count of misdemeanor possession of marijuana, both in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 35-7-1031 (LexisNexis 2003). Ingersoll contends the district court erred when it denied his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas and rehear his suppression motion. Ingersoll also asserts that his appointed attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel. Upon review, we affirm.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] Ingersoll sets forth the following…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Steve Paul Wilson, A/K/A Mike L. Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. O'BOYLE v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Follett v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Bear Cloud v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  4. DeLoge v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. John Michael Sides, Jr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API