Legal Opinion

Lansdown v. Smith & Sons Reserve Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1934No. Civ. No. 648PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

In this action the plaintiff sought to permanently enjoin the defendants from selling certain real property, proceedings for the sale of which had been begun under a trust deed given to the defendant title company to secure a note given by the individual defendants to the first-named corporation defendant.

The amended complaint alleged that the plaintiff was the beneficiary under another trust deed covering the same property, and that both trust deeds were recorded on the same day. In a first cause of action it was alleged that no default existed in connection with the first-named trust deed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Faria v. BrandonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bartholomae Oil Corp. v. SeagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Boggs v. North American Bond & Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  3. County of Los Angeles v. ButcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API