Legal Opinion

Cottrell v. Amerkan

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 20, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNS, J.:

These proceedings are pending on petition for certiorari under Rule 34, and respondent has sought to dismiss such proceedings because the order sought to be reviewed was an. order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s bill of complaint when the petitioner had suffered the entering of a final decree against him before the presentation of the petition for certiorari, which final decree was not effectively appealed.

Authorities relied upon by the respondent for the dismissal of the certiorari are as follows:

Stockton v. Harmon, 32 Fla. 312, 13 So. 833, was a case heard upon a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Willey v. W. J. Hoggson Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. Banks v. GuinyardSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  3. Stockton v. HarmonSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  4. Burnham v. DriggersSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
  5. Stanley v. Standard Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Fields v. ZinmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Gans v. State, Department of Professional & Occupational RegulationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Redwine v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Redwine v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API