Legal Opinion

Waters v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action for salary.

1Opinion of the CourtMaddox, J.

Plaintiff, at the time of the consolidation, held a classified competitive position, that of bookkeeper, and was, pursuant to the provisions of section 1536 of the Hew York Charter (Laws of 18-97, chap. 378), assigned to, and continued in, the performance of the same duties in the comptroller’s office of the greater city. He had been lawfully appointed, in February, 1895, by the comptroller of the former city of Brooklyn as bookkeeper in said comptroller’s office, and, perforce of the section before cited, being “not subject to removal without cause,” and his position *155not “ vacated- by reason…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Callahan v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. People Ex Rel. Leet v. . KellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. People ex rel. Lodholz v. KnoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. People Ex Rel. Terry v. . KellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. People ex rel. Callahan v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kenison v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  2. In re GriffinNew York Supreme Court · 1912
  3. McCoach v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Waters v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API