Vought v. Porter
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Appeal from an order denying defendant’s alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial. The facts are stated in Vought v. Porter, 168 Minn. 43, 209 N. W. 642.
Plaintiff in 1919 purchased from Ole Eeierson a farm. He paid $1,000 to apply on the contract. Later he paid another $1,000. He then contracted to sell the farm to one Stultz under a contract giving the purchaser possession. Stultz was unable to make payments, and a contract was made extending the time of payments but giving plaintiff the right of possession for a time. Plaintiff could not make his payments to Eeierson. He…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Vought v. PorterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
3Cited by1 opinion
- Donnelly v. StepkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934