Legal Opinion

Schaeffer v. Schaeffer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 13, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rigler, J.), dated December 12, 2000, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiff’s motion to impose a sanction upon him pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The sanctions provisions of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 are designed, among other things, to limit the prevalence of frivolous and harassing behavior. Thus, the rule provides that conduct is frivolous if “(2) it is undertaken primarily to delay or prolong the resolution of the litigation, or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Breslaw v. BreslawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Gotlib v. RatsutskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Insanally v. InsanallyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kornblum v. KornblumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Nash v. Yablon-NashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Davey v. DaveyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Crisafulli v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Lipp v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyNew York Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API