Legal Opinion

Cooley v. Bergin

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 30, 1928No. 2984PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

The respondent Bergin is an internal revenue agent, engaged in cheeking up the income tax return of the petitioner, and in pursuance of his duties he issued a summons to the respondent Third National Bank & Trust Company, by which the bank was requested to appear before the agent and to bring with it its records, showing the details of the deposits and withdrawals of the petitioner for the period beginning January 1, 1925, and ending December 31, 1926. The summons recited that, if the bank should fail to comply, it would become liable to proceedings in the District…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Bank of the Republic v. MillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Colorado v. TollSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Georgia v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  5. Sheridan v. ColvinIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cravens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. United States v. Peoples Deposit Bank & Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1953
  3. United States v. First Nat. Bank of MobileDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1946
  4. In Re Upham's Income TaxDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937
  5. Secretario de Hacienda v. Tribunal SuperiorSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API