Legal Opinion

in Matter of Robert M. Morgenthau v. Levittan

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1983PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Hilda G. Schwartz, J.

Petitioner, the District Attorney of New York County, seeks judgment in this CPLR article 78 proceeding in the nature of prohibition, vacating the conviction and sentence of respondent Jose Agosta on February 12, 1983, on the ground that respondent Levittan, as Judge of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, acted in excess of that court’s jurisdiction.

On February 12, 1983, respondent Agosta appeared before respondent Levittan for arraignment on a felony complaint, charging him with robbery in the second degree (Penal Law, § 160.10). According to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MATTER OF STATE OF NY v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Cosgrove v. KubiniecAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Gribetz v. EdelsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. YoungCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API