Legal Opinion

Haarmann v. Lueders

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided May 11, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit for infringement of patent. On exceptions to bill.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

There are live exceptions taken by the defendants to the complainants’ bill. The first relates to a decree sustaining complainants’ patent, entered upon consent, in this court. This is not an application for preliminary injunction. Following the decision in Western Electric Co. v. Williams-Abbott Electric Co. (C. C.) 83 Fed. 842, this allegation setting forth such, a decree is impertinent, and the motion to expunge paragraph 4 of the bill is granted. The second exception is waived by the defendants, and is therefore overruled. The balance of the exceptions go to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coop v. Dr. Savage Physical Development Institute, Ltd.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1891
  2. Western Electric Co. v. Williams-Abbott Electric Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1897
  3. Keller v. StraussU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lovell Mfg. Co. v. Automatic Wringer Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API