Schoemaker v. Metropolitan Utilities District
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C. J.
Lori A. Schoemaker appeals the order of the district court, which, in her claim against the Metropolitan Utilities District, found that she had failed to satisfy the requirements of the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-901 et seq. (Reissue 1987), and sustained the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
In appellate review of a summary judgment, the court views the evidence in a light most favorable to the party against whom the judgment is granted and gives such party the benefit of all reasonable inferences deducible from the evidence. Hillie v. Mutual…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Millman v. County of ButlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- Plambeck v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Chicago Lumber Co. v. School District No. 71Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- VonSeggern v. WillmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Willis v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Polinski v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Hatcher v. Bellevue Volunteer Fire Dept.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Estate of McElwee v. Omaha Transit AuthorityNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Daniels v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Centric Jones Company, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. City of Kearney, Nebraska, Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.