Legal Opinion

City of New York v. M. Wineburgh Advertising Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 6, 1908No. 4PublishedCited by 2 opinions

■ Appeal by the defendant, the M. Wineburgh Advertising Company, from an order of the Appellate Term of the- Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of' the .county of New York on the 10th day of December, 1907, affirming á judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, in favor of the plaintiff, rendered on the 27th day of June, 1907.

1Opinion of the Court

Scott,- J.:

- Appeal by defendant from the determination of the Appellate Term affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court for the recovery of a penalty.

■ We have recently- had occasion to discuss at some length the provisions of the Building. Code of the city of Hew York with reference to the erection of so-called “ sky signs ” upon buildings, and ■ concluded that such erections were structures which could not lawfully be erected until plans therefor had been, filed and á permit issued»' (City of New York v. Wineburgh Advertising. Co., 122 App. Div. 748.)

In the, present case| the defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of New York v. M. Wineburgh Advertising Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. O. J. Gude Co. v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. O. J. Gude Co. v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API