Legal Opinion

People v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 21, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*557The court was not obligated, sua sponte, to order a CPL article 730 examination (see Pate v Robinson, 383 US 375 [1966]; People v Tortorici, 92 NY2d 757 [1999], cert denied 528 US 834 [1999]; People v Morgan, 87 NY2d 878 [1995]). Although, at times, defendant engaged in obnoxious behavior and made outrageous statements, he did not manifest an inability to understand the proceedings or assist in his defense. Defendant was generally lucid and took an active role in his defense (see e.g. People v Mendez, 306 AD2d 143 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 622 [2003]). Furthermore, the court ordered a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. WattsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. GoetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. TortoriciNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. People v. MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. FindleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  3. People v. McCrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  4. People v. ReinfurtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API