Legal Opinion

Cappadonna v. Illinois Surety Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by one Cappadonna against the Illinois Surety Company. Leave to answer granted defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtGrebnbaum, J.

The defendant having demurred to the complaint, the plaintiff moved for judgment upon the pleadings pursuant to section 547 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court in effect overruled the demurrer by granting judgment for the plaintiff, directing that notice of settlement of the order be given. Defendant asks for leave to answer.

In my opinion, the practice quite universally prevailing of permitting the defeated party, after the trial of a demurrer, to plead anew upon payment of taxable costs, is liable to lead to abuse, unless the court has some proof before it tending to show that the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ellenborger v. SlocumAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API